On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 19:35 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:06:54AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:53:04AM +0200, David Weinehall wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:21:01PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > > This commit adding all known marketing names for latest gen9 platforms.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > README | 2 +-
> > > > man/intel.man | 2 +-
> > > > src/intel_module.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/README b/README
> > > > index cf4d88d..e58477d 100644
> > > > --- a/README
> > > > +++ b/README
> > > > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Intel graphics chipsets including:
> > > > G/Q33,G/Q35,G41,G/Q43,G/GM/Q45
> > > > PineView-M (Atom N400 series)
> > > > PineView-D (Atom D400/D500 series)
> > > > - Intel(R) HD Graphics: 2000-6000,
> > > > + Intel(R) HD Graphics: 500-6000/P530/P555/P580,
> > > > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics: 5100/6100, and
> > > > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics: 5200/6200/P6300.
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/man/intel.man b/man/intel.man
> > > > index 8da496e..16cc5d9 100644
> > > > --- a/man/intel.man
> > > > +++ b/man/intel.man
> > > > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ supports the i810, i810-DC100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 852GM, 855GM,
> > > > 865G, 915G, 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 965G, 965Q, 946GZ, 965GM, 945GME,
> > > > G33, Q33, Q35, G35, GM45, G45, Q45, G43, G41 chipsets, Pineview-M in
> > > > Atom N400 series, Pineview-D in Atom D400/D500 series,
> > > > -Intel(R) HD Graphics: 2000-6000,
> > > > +Intel(R) HD Graphics: 500-6000/P530/P555/P580,
> > > > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics: 5100/6100, and
> > > > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics: 5200/6200/P6300.
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/src/intel_module.c b/src/intel_module.c
> > > > index e443c9e..86b4aae 100644
> > > > --- a/src/intel_module.c
> > > > +++ b/src/intel_module.c
> > > > @@ -272,6 +272,33 @@ static const SymTabRec intel_chipsets[] = {
> > > > {0x22b2, "HD Graphics"},
> > > > {0x22b3, "HD Graphics"},
> > > >
> > > > + /* Skylake */
> > > > + {0x1902, "HD Graphics 510"},
> > > > + {0x1906, "HD Graphics 510"},
> > > > + {0x190B, "HD Graphics 510"},
> > > > + {0x1912, "HD Graphics 530"},
> > > > + {0x1916, "HD Graphics 520"},
> > > > + {0x191B, "HD Graphics 530"},
> > > > + {0x191D, "HD Graphics P530"},
> > > > + {0x191E, "HD Graphics 515"},
> > > > + {0x1921, "HD Graphics 520"},
> > > > + {0x1926, "Iris Graphics 540"},
> > > > + {0x1927, "Iris Graphics 550"},
> > > > + {0x192B, "Iris Graphics 555"},
> > > > + {0x192D, "Iris Graphics P555"},
> > > > + {0x1932, "Iris Pro Graphics 580"},
> > > > + {0x193A, "Iris Pro Graphics P580"},
> > > > + {0x193B, "Iris Pro Graphics 580"},
> > > > + {0x193D, "Iris Pro Graphics P580"},
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Broxton (Apollolake) */
> > > > + {0x5A84, "HD Graphics 505"},
> > > > + {0x5A85, "HD Graphics 500"},
> > > > +
> > > > + /* Kabylake */
> > > > + {0x5916, "HD Graphics 620"},
> > > > + {0x591E, "HD Graphics 615"},
> > > > +
> > > > /* When adding new identifiers, also update:
> > > > * 1. intel_identify()
> > > > * 2. man/intel.man
> > > > @@ -465,7 +492,7 @@ static void intel_identify(int flags)
> > > > if (unique != stack)
> > > > free(unique);
> > > >
> > > > - xf86Msg(X_INFO, INTEL_NAME ": Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphics: 2000-6000\n");
> > > > + xf86Msg(X_INFO, INTEL_NAME ": Driver for Intel(R) HD Graphics: 500-6000/P530/P555/P580\n");
> > > > xf86Msg(X_INFO, INTEL_NAME ": Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics: 5100, 6100\n");
> > > > xf86Msg(X_INFO, INTEL_NAME ": Driver for Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics: 5200, 6200, P6300\n");
> > >
> > > You missed the Iris & Iris Pro models.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > >
> > > Also, might it make sense to use 5xx, P5xx instead?
> >
> > What about ont those generic lists we just kill all numbers and let just:
> > "
> > Intel(R) HD Graphics.
> > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Graphics.
> > Intel(R) Iris(TM) Pro Graphics.
> > '
> > ?
> >
> > Chris?
>
> Seems reasonable, and as demonstrated in the past simply listing
> everything becomes unwieldy, if not unfathomable, quickly.
>
> I honestly don't think the listing here is the primary source for
> compatibility info
agree
> (since to get here means that the driver recognised
> the chipset anyway).
If it is already recognized at this intel_identify point, is it possible
to grab the device id and than run on that list and only print the know
market name?
or that is better to let there on detect function?
> For that we can throw into the catch all case in
> intel_identify().
What do you mean? throw all this list away? or really list everyone here
on intel_identify but remove the numbers from other plances?
> -Chris
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
