[PATCH] drm/i915: Remove misinformation about mark_busy/mark_idle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nowadays these are solely for managing the GT wakelock. Don't confuse
the reader by referring to how they used to work, nor suggest they are
deprecated simply because they are no longer relevant for frontbuffer
tracking.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
index 966de4c7c7a2..5c0778a61a2a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_frontbuffer.c
@@ -53,11 +53,6 @@
  * busyness. There is no direct way to detect idleness. Instead an idle timer
  * work delayed work should be started from the flush and flip functions and
  * cancelled as soon as busyness is detected.
- *
- * Note that there's also an older frontbuffer activity tracking scheme which
- * just tracks general activity. This is done by the various mark_busy and
- * mark_idle functions. For display power management features using these
- * functions is deprecated and should be avoided.
  */
 
 #include <drm/drmP.h>
-- 
2.10.2

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux