On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16 November 2016 at 13:58, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On 15 November 2016 at 09:27, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, David Weinehall <tao@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:44:25PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 06 Oct 2016, Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>>>>> > index 23a6c7213eca..7412a05fa5d9 100644 >>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c >>>>>> > @@ -14636,6 +14636,7 @@ static const struct drm_crtc_funcs intel_crtc_funcs = { >>>>>> > .page_flip = intel_crtc_page_flip, >>>>>> > .atomic_duplicate_state = intel_crtc_duplicate_state, >>>>>> > .atomic_destroy_state = intel_crtc_destroy_state, >>>>>> > + .set_crc_source = intel_crtc_set_crc_source, >>>>>> > }; >>>>>> > >>>>>> > /** >>>>>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>>> > index 737261b09110..31894b7c6517 100644 >>>>>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h >>>>>> > @@ -1844,6 +1844,14 @@ void intel_color_load_luts(struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state); >>>>>> > /* intel_pipe_crc.c */ >>>>>> > int intel_pipe_crc_create(struct drm_minor *minor); >>>>>> > void intel_pipe_crc_cleanup(struct drm_minor *minor); >>>>>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS >>>>>> > +int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name, >>>>>> > + size_t *values_cnt); >>>>>> > +#else >>>>>> > +static inline int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, >>>>>> > + const char *source_name, >>>>>> > + size_t *values_cnt) { return 0; } >>>>>> > +#endif >>>>>> >>>>>> "inline" here doesn't work because it's used as a function pointer. >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it better to have a function that returns 0 for .set_crc_source, or >>>>>> to set .set_crc_source to NULL when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n? >>>>> >>>>> I'd say that whenever we have a function pointer we should have a dummy >>>>> function without side-effects for this kind of things. >>>> >>>> Whoever calls .set_crc_source could do smarter things depending on the >>>> hook not being there vs. just silently plunging on. >>> >>> In this specific case, when CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n it doesn't make any >>> sense to call that callback, so I think we should have a dummy >>> implementation to avoid adding an ifdef to the .c. >> >> We don't want the ifdef to the .c file, but we could do >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS >> int intel_crtc_set_crc_source(struct drm_crtc *crtc, const char *source_name, >> size_t *values_cnt); >> #else >> #define intel_crtc_set_crc_source NULL >> #endif > > Sounds good to me, and though I don't have any objections, wonder why > this isn't a common idiom in the DRM subsystem. I was able to find > only one instance: drm_compat_ioctl. Heh, and it was I who suggested that too. Maybe get a second opinion. ;) BR, Jani. > > Regards, > > Tomeu -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx