On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Well, had to drop it again since it didn't compile: >> >> >> CC [M] drivers/gpu/drm/drm_blend.o >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c: In function ‘drm_atomic_plane_print_state’: >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c:920:5: error: too few arguments to function ‘drm_get_format_name’ >> drm_get_format_name(fb->pixel_format)); >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> In file included from ./include/drm/drmP.h:71:0, >> from drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c:29: >> ./include/drm/drm_fourcc.h:65:7: note: declared here >> char *drm_get_format_name(uint32_t format, struct drm_format_name_buf *buf); >> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> Can you pls rebase onto drm-misc or linux-next or something? > > That was based on airlied/drm-next (last fetched on Sunday I think), > I can rebase it on drm-misc if it helps, but it seems older than > drm-next. > Should I just rebase on top of current head of drm-next? It needs to be drm-misc (linux-next doesn't have it yet) due to the new atomic debug work that we just landed. I'm working on drm-tip as a drm local integration tree to ease pains like these a bit, but that doesn't really exist yet. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
