On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:19 AM, sourab gupta <sourab.gupta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 11:49 -0800, Robert Bragg wrote:
> The maximum OA sampling frequency is now configurable via a
> dev.i915.oa_max_sample_rate sysctl parameter.
>
> Following the precedent set by perf's similar
> kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate the default maximum rate is 100000Hz There's no check for 'oa_sample_rate_hard_limit' anywhere below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++--------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ perf.c
> index e51c1d8..1a87fe9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,21 @@ static u32 i915_perf_stream_paranoid = true;
> #define INVALID_CTX_ID 0xffffffff
>
>
> +/* For sysctl proc_dointvec_minmax of i915_oa_max_sample_rate
> + *
> + * 160ns is the smallest sampling period we can theoretically program the OA
> + * unit with on Haswell, corresponding to 6.25MHz.
> + */
> +static int oa_sample_rate_hard_limit = 6250000;
It's in the struct ctl_table oa_table[] declaration of the "oa_max_sample_rate" paramater, assigned to .extra2 which is referenced by the proc_dointvec_minmax validation handler for the parameter.
I assume now that there'll be a platform specific check for 80ull, while
> +
> +/* Theoretically we can program the OA unit to sample every 160ns but don't
> + * allow that by default unless root...
> + *
> + * The default threshold of 100000Hz is based on perf's similar
> + * kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate sysctl parameter.
> + */
> +static u32 i915_oa_max_sample_rate = 100000;
> +
> /* XXX: beware if future OA HW adds new report formats that the current
> * code assumes all reports have a power-of-two size and ~(size - 1) can
> * be used as a mask to align the OA tail pointer.
> @@ -1314,6 +1329,7 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> for (i = 0; i < n_props; i++) {
> + u64 oa_period, oa_freq_hz;
> u64 id, value;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1359,21 +1375,35 @@ static int read_properties_unlocked(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - /* NB: The exponent represents a period as follows:
> - *
> - * 80ns * 2^(period_exponent + 1)
> - *
> - * Theoretically we can program the OA unit to sample
> + /* Theoretically we can program the OA unit to sample
> * every 160ns but don't allow that by default unless
> * root.
> *
> - * Referring to perf's
> - * kernel.perf_event_max_sample_rate for a precedent
> - * (100000 by default); with an OA exponent of 6 we get
> - * a period of 10.240 microseconds -just under 100000Hz
> + * On Haswell the period is derived from the exponent
> + * as:
> + *
> + * period = 80ns * 2^(exponent + 1)
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(oa_period) != 8);
> + oa_period = 80ull * (2ull << value);
programming oa_period, for subquent Gen8+ platforms, which should be
fine.
Yeah, this code will need adapting for gen9+. I guess we'll change it to work in terms of ((2<<exp) * NSEC_PER_SEC) / timestamp_frequency.
> +
> + /* This check is primarily to ensure that oa_period <=
> + * UINT32_MAX (before passing to do_div which only
> + * accepts a u32 denominator), but we can also skip
> + * checking anything < 1Hz which implicitly can't be
> + * limited via an integer oa_max_sample_rate.
> */
> - if (value < 6 && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> - DRM_ERROR("Minimum OA sampling exponent is 6 without root privileges\n");
> + if (oa_period <= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
> + u64 tmp = NSEC_PER_SEC;
> + do_div(tmp, oa_period);
> + oa_freq_hz = tmp;
> + } else
> + oa_freq_hz = 0;
> +
> + if (oa_freq_hz > i915_oa_max_sample_rate &&
> + !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN)) {
> + DRM_ERROR("OA exponent would exceed the max sampling frequency (sysctl dev.i915.oa_max_sample_rate) %uHz without root privileges\n",
> + i915_oa_max_sample_rate);
> return -EACCES;
> }
>
> @@ -1481,6 +1511,15 @@ static struct ctl_table oa_table[] = {
> .extra1 = &zero,
> .extra2 = &one,
> },
> + {
> + .procname = "oa_max_sample_rate",
> + .data = ""> > + .maxlen = sizeof(i915_oa_max_sample_rate),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec_minmax,
> + .extra1 = &zero,
> + .extra2 = &oa_sample_rate_hard_limit,
> + },
> {}
> };
>
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
