On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 07:55:20PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:45:43PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Em Qui, 2016-11-03 às 18:45 +0200, Ville Syrjälä escreveu:
> > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 02:37:15PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > >
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c | 6 +++---
> > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > index faa67624e1ed..0028335fc1bb 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbc.c
> > > > @@ -1060,7 +1060,7 @@ void intel_fbc_choose_crtc(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > >
> > > > mutex_lock(&fbc->lock);
> > > >
> > > > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > > > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i) {
> > > > if (fbc->crtc == to_intel_crtc(crtc)) {
> > > > fbc_crtc_present = true;
> > > > break;
> > > > @@ -1074,14 +1074,14 @@ void intel_fbc_choose_crtc(struct
> > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > > * plane. We could go for fancier schemes such as checking
> > > > the plane
> > > > * size, but this would just affect the few platforms that
> > > > don't tie FBC
> > > > * to pipe or plane A. */
> > > > - for_each_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i) {
> > > > + for_each_new_plane_in_state(state, plane, plane_state, i)
> > > > {
> > > > struct intel_plane_state *intel_plane_state =
> > > > to_intel_plane_state(plane_state);
> > > >
> > > > if (!intel_plane_state->base.visible)
> > > > continue;
> > >
> > > Unrelated but this thing looks somewhat bogus. FBC is tied to the
> > > primary plane only, so why do we care about the visibility of the
> > > other
> > > planes? Adding Paulo to Cc...
> >
> > Looks like you've found a bug... Thanks! We should really be iterating
> > over primary planes only. Adding to the TODO list.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > - for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, j)
> > > > {
> > > > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc,
> > > > crtc_state, j) {
> > >
> > > Also, can't this inner loop be replaced with a simple
> > > crtc = plane_state->crtc ?
> >
> > Is there a way to get the proposed crtc_state without the loop?
>
> ...get_existing_crtc_state(plane_state->crtc);
>
> since the plane is part of the state the crtc should be too, I think.
Well, I guess Maarten wants to change it to get_new_state() soon enough.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
