On ma, 2016-10-31 at 10:26 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote: > During shrinking, we walk over the list of objects searching for > victims. Any that are not removed are put back into the global list. > Currently, they are put back in order (at the front) which means they > will be first to be scanned again. If we instead move them to the rear > of the list, we will scan new potential victims on the next pass and > waste less time rescanning unshrinkable objects. Normally the lists are > kept in rough order to shrinking (with object least frequently used at > the start), by moving just scanned objects to the rear we are > acknowledging that they are still in use. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
