On Tue, 2016-10-25 at 11:46 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 09:18:37PM -0700, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote: > > According to BSpec, cdclk has to be not less than 432 MHz with DP audio > > enabled, port width x4, and link rate HBR2 (5.4 GHz) > > > > Having a lower cdclk triggers pipe underruns, which then lead to displays > > continuously cycling off and on. This is essential for DP MST audio as the > > link is trained at HBR2 and 4 lanes by default. > > > > v2: Restrict fix to BDW > > Retain the set cdclk across modesets (Ville) > > > > Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > index a94f7d1..8c59651 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c > > @@ -10260,6 +10260,18 @@ static void bxt_modeset_commit_cdclk(struct drm_atomic_state *old_state) > > bxt_set_cdclk(to_i915(dev), req_cdclk); > > } > > > > +static unsigned int bdw_dp_audio_cdclk(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > +{ > > + > > Useless blank line. > > > + if (intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder(crtc_state) && > > + crtc_state->has_audio && > > + crtc_state->port_clock >= 540000 && > > + crtc_state->lane_count == 4) > > + return 432000; > > + > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > /* compute the max rate for new configuration */ > > static int ilk_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > { > > @@ -10275,7 +10287,7 @@ static int ilk_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > sizeof(intel_state->min_pixclk)); > > > > for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i) { > > - int pixel_rate; > > + unsigned int pixel_rate; > > > > crtc_state = to_intel_crtc_state(cstate); > > if (!crtc_state->base.enable) { > > @@ -10285,9 +10297,19 @@ static int ilk_max_pixel_rate(struct drm_atomic_state *state) > > > > pixel_rate = ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(crtc_state); > > > > + if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) { > > /* pixel rate mustn't exceed 95% of cdclk with IPS on BDW */ > > - if (IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv) && crtc_state->ips_enabled) > > - pixel_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate * 100, 95); > > + if (crtc_state->ips_enabled) > > + pixel_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP(pixel_rate * 100, 95); > > + > > + /* BSpec says "Do not use DisplayPort with CDCLK less than > > + * 432 MHz, audio enabled, port width x4, and link rate > > + * HBR2 (5.4 GHz), or else there may be audio corruption or > > + * screen corruption." > > + */ > > Indentation of the comments is wrong. > > > + pixel_rate = max(pixel_rate, > > + bdw_dp_audio_cdclk(crtc_state)); > > + } > > > > intel_state->min_pixclk[i] = pixel_rate; > > Otherwise I suppose this ought to work. > > So with the formatting stuff fixed this is > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > The whole min_pixclk vs. pixel_rate vs. cdclk thing is a bit of a mess > though. So it could use a thorough cleaning to make it less confusing. > I'm tinking we might just want to start tracking a minimum acceptable > cdclk per pipe. Probably the main thing would be to pull in the > 5%/10% guardband handling here for all platforms. > Yeah, definitely needs some work. As you wrote in the previous review, we can get rid of tracking min_pixclk and track min_cdclk instead. I could not find any other use for min_pixclk other than computing cdclk. Thanks for the review. -DK > > } > > -- > > 2.7.4 > _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx