Re: ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: fix comment on I915_{READ,WRITE}_FW (rev2)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 04:27:26PM +0200, Saarinen, Jani wrote:
> > == Series Details ==
> > 
> > Series: drm/i915: fix comment on I915_{READ,WRITE}_FW (rev2)
> > URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/14334/
> > State : failure
> > 
> > == Summary ==
> > 
> > Series 14334v2 drm/i915: fix comment on I915_{READ,WRITE}_FW
> > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/14334/revisions/2/mbox/
> > 
> > Test drv_module_reload_basic:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-skl-6700hq)
> >                 skip       -> PASS       (fi-skl-6260u)
> > Test gem_exec_suspend:
> >         Subgroup basic-s3:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> > Test gem_sync:
> >         Subgroup basic-many-each:
> >                 pass       -> FAIL       (fi-ilk-650)
> All can now see data details on logs link below but here still few times to remind ;)

Thanks! I was figuring out what to do with this error, therefore my
dealy with the reply. I had access to the results even before c;

> Out	
> IGT-Version: 1.16-g1df15af (x86_64) (Linux: 4.9.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_2809+ x86_64)
> Using Legacy submission 
> render completed 737 cycles
> bsd completed 324 cycles
> Stack trace:
>   #0 [__igt_fail_assert+0x101]
>   #1 [store_many+0x284]
>   #2 [<unknown>+0x284]
> Subtest basic-many-each: FAIL (5.573s)
> 
> Err	
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function store_many, file gem_sync.c:506:
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd) == 0
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: error: 4 != 0
> Subtest basic-many-each failed.
> **** DEBUG ****
> (gem_sync:7909) INFO: render completed 737 cycles
> (gem_sync:7909) INFO: bsd completed 324 cycles
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function store_many, file gem_sync.c:506:
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: intel_detect_and_clear_missed_interrupts(fd) == 0
> (gem_sync:7909) CRITICAL: error: 4 != 0
> ****  END  ****

That's definately not caused by this change as only one comment in the
code is affected.

Should I put bugzilla on it? (I haven't found any on the issue already).

> > Test kms_pipe_crc_basic:
> >         Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> >         Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
> >                 pass       -> DMESG-WARN (fi-skl-6770hq)
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> >         Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c:
> >                 dmesg-warn -> PASS       (fi-skl-6700hq)
> > 
> > 
> > cd1dba8d045ce0d59029226108f0ad7b35a9d061 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-10m-
> > 25d-09h-26m-24s UTC integration manifest
> > 98dec85 drm/i915: fix comment on I915_{READ, WRITE}_FW
> > 
> > Full results at https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_2809/
> > 
> > == Logs ==
> > 
> > For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/CI/Patchwork_2809/

-- 
Cheers,
Arek
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux