On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:10 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 10:19:05PM +0100, Robert Bragg wrote:
> +int i915_gem_context_pin_legacy_rcs_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, This is still no.
> + struct i915_gem_context *ctx,
> + u64 flags)
Okay, but it's a little frustrating for me to go in circles here :-/
I didn't originally do it this way; I originally looked at pinning the context when opening the stream so I didn't have to consider it being relocated. The feedback from Daniel Vetter was to look at doing it this way I think because of some concern to do with some shrinker corner cases.
... just dug up the archive:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-November/055385.html
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-November/055385.html
Can you maybe please explain what's wrong with the current approach and provide some justification for a different approach with some reassurance that Daniel's original concern with the shrinker unpinning contexts isn't actually a problem? I don't currently understand the concern with this, and this approach seems to have been working well for quite a long time now.
- Robert
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
