On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 02:47:32PM -0700, Jeff McGee wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 11:43:02AM -0700, Anusha Srivatsa wrote:
> > From: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > This patch will allow for getparams to return the status of the HuC.
> > As the HuC has to be validated by the GuC this patch uses the validated
> > status to show when the HuC is loaded and ready for use. You cannot use
> > the loaded status as with the GuC as the HuC is verified after it is
> > loaded and is not usable until it is verified.
> >
> > v2: removed the forewakes as the registers are already force-woken.
> > (T.Ursulin)
> > v4: rebased.
> > v5: rebased.
> >
> > Tested-by: Xiang Haihao <haihao.xiang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Antoine <peter.antoine@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 4 ++++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h | 2 +-
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > index ff1c18d..0d7b290 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
> > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@
> > #include "i915_trace.h"
> > #include "i915_vgpu.h"
> > #include "intel_drv.h"
> > +#include "intel_huc.h"
> > #include "intel_guc.h"
> >
> > static struct drm_driver driver;
> > @@ -343,6 +344,9 @@ static int i915_getparam(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
> > case I915_PARAM_HAS_GUC:
> > value = intel_is_guc_valid(dev_priv);
> > break;
> > + case I915_PARAM_HAS_HUC:
> > + value = intel_is_huc_valid(dev_priv);
> > + break;
> > default:
> > DRM_DEBUG("Unknown parameter %d\n", param->param);
> > return -EINVAL;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> > index 946caa7..5eac625 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc.h
> > @@ -40,5 +40,5 @@ extern void intel_huc_init(struct drm_device *dev);
> > extern int intel_huc_load(struct drm_device *dev);
> > extern void intel_huc_auth(struct drm_device *dev);
> > extern void intel_huc_fini(struct drm_device *dev);
> > -
> > +extern int intel_is_huc_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> > #endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> > index 87a6948..d574183 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_huc_loader.c
> > @@ -273,3 +273,17 @@ void intel_huc_fini(struct drm_device *dev)
> >
> > huc_fw->fetch_status = UC_FIRMWARE_NONE;
> > }
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * intel_is_huc_valid() - Check to see if the HuC is fully loaded.
> > + * @dev_priv: drm device to check.
> > + *
> > + * This function will return true if the guc has been loaded and
> > + * has valid firmware. The simplest way of doing this is to check
> > + * if the HuC has been validated, if so it must have been loaded.
> > + */
> > +int intel_is_huc_valid(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> I'm still unclear on the 'intel' vs. 'i915' prefix usage. But it seems
> that intel prefixed functions accept drm_device instead of drm_i915_private.
intel_ is core and modeset, i915_ is gem stuff. mostly. Absolutely nothing
to do with drm_device vs. drm_i915_private, that should only be a question
of whether it's a drm vfunc or an internal one (we're transitioning to
that pattern, so atm it's a bit a mess).
> Also, need to see the userspace usage of this new GETPARAM.
+1 ;-)
Cheers, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
