On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The test is producing a lot of CI noise. > > Signed-off-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > Will be pushed shortly. Visible in CI results tomorrow-ish. > > > tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 1 - > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > index ae94381..e2fc9ac 100644 > --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist > @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@read-crc-pipe-c-frame-sequence > igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-a > igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b > igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-c > -igt@kms_psr_sink_crc@psr_basic This landed without an ack from Rodrigo and Jim as the engineers. That's not good at all, because the point of this list was that we have more visibility in what CI does. Adding Rodrigo and Jim as fyi. More generally I think we need to have full-on review requirement for igt patches too, to avoid this kind of fun. Sneaking stuff in like this is a no-go. -Daniel > igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc > igt@kms_sink_crc_basic > igt@pm_backlight@basic-brightness > -- > 2.9.3 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
