On ke, 2016-10-12 at 12:16 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > The current meaning of whether an object has a GGTT vma is very > ill-defined (and note we don't check for any partials either), it just > means that at some point it was in the GGTT but it may not be now. The > information we really care about here is whether it is taking up > precious mappable aperture space. This is the obj->fault_mappable flag. > We have a redundant long form reprinting of this information, so remove > that in favour of the compact flag. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'm sure I already reviewed this as a part of another patch, but better as a separate one! Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
