On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 10:34:14AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2016, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for the > > workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just > > unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we can > > close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how easy > > it will be to backport the final implementation to the stable Kernels, > > and this patch here is probably easier to backport. > > > > At the present moment I still don't have confirmation that this patch > > fixes any of the bugs listed below, but we should definitely try > > testing all of them again. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94605 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94884 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95010 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96226 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96828 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97450 > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97830 > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > The patch is a bit on the large side for stable. 100 lines with context > is the rule. Huh? It's only 49 line of changes: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) That's fine for stable, we take i915 stable patches much bigger than that all the time :) thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
