I feel like the PRMs should be a little less confusing so it doesn't take four of us reading it to actually get the full spec into code… Anyway, while this is going to be running on more then just skylake I feel like intel_needs_memory_bw_wa() is a little confusing since I would expect eventually we're going to have to apply other unrelated memory bandwidth workarounds on other platforms. How about skl_needs_memory_bw_wa() or gen9_needs_memory_bw_wa()? On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 20:46 +0000, Zanoni, Paulo R wrote: > Em Seg, 2016-10-10 às 16:34 -0400, Lyude Paul escreveu: > > > > Was there a new workaround added recently? Or was this something I > > just > > missed when writing the original code for this > > It's listed on the public spec: > https://01.org/sites/default/files/docum > entation/intel-gfx-prm-osrc-skl-vol12-display.pdf > > Pages 210 - 211. > > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 17:30 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mahesh Kumar is already working on a proper implementation for > > > the > > > workaround, but while we still don't have it, let's just > > > unconditionally apply the workaround for everybody and we hope we > > > can > > > close all those numerous bugzilla tickets. Also, I'm not sure how > > > easy > > > it will be to backport the final implementation to the stable > > > Kernels, > > > and this patch here is probably easier to backport. > > > > > > At the present moment I still don't have confirmation that this > > > patch > > > fixes any of the bugs listed below, but we should definitely try > > > testing all of them again. > > > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94337 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94605 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94884 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95010 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96226 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96828 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97450 > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97830 > > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Lyude <cpaul@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 49 > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > > > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > index 62d730d..159831d 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > @@ -2879,6 +2879,21 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane > > > *plane) > > > } > > > } > > > > > > +/* > > > + * FIXME: We still don't have the proper code detect if we need > > > to > > > apply the WA, > > > + * so assume we'll always need it in order to avoid underruns. > > > + */ > > > +static bool intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct intel_atomic_state > > > *state) > > > +{ > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state- > > > > > > > > > > > > base.dev); > > > + > > > + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_BROXTON(dev_priv) || > > > + IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv)) > > > + return true; > > > + > > > + return false; > > > +} > > > + > > > static bool > > > intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) > > > { > > > @@ -2999,9 +3014,10 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct > > > drm_atomic_state *state) > > > struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; > > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > > struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = > > > to_intel_atomic_state(state); > > > - struct drm_crtc *crtc; > > > + struct intel_crtc *crtc; > > > + struct intel_plane *plane; > > > enum pipe pipe; > > > - int level, plane; > > > + int level, id, latency; > > > > > > if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv)) > > > return false; > > > @@ -3019,27 +3035,36 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct > > > drm_atomic_state *state) > > > > > > /* Since we're now guaranteed to only have one active > > > CRTC... */ > > > pipe = ffs(intel_state->active_crtcs) - 1; > > > - crtc = dev_priv->pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]; > > > + crtc = to_intel_crtc(dev_priv- > > > > > > > > pipe_to_crtc_mapping[pipe]); > > > > > > - if (crtc->state->mode.flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > > > + if (crtc->base.state->mode.flags & > > > DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) > > > return false; > > > > > > - for_each_plane(dev_priv, pipe, plane) { > > > + for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, crtc, plane) { > > > + id = skl_wm_plane_id(plane); > > > + > > > /* Skip this plane if it's not enabled */ > > > - if (intel_state- > > > >wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][0] > > > == > > > 0) > > > + if (intel_state->wm_results.plane[pipe][id][0] > > > == > > > 0) > > > continue; > > > > > > /* Find the highest enabled wm level for this > > > plane > > > */ > > > for (level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev); > > > - intel_state- > > > > > > > > > > > > wm_results.plane[pipe][plane][level] == 0; --level) > > > + intel_state- > > > > > > > > wm_results.plane[pipe][id][level] > > > == 0; --level) > > > { } > > > > > > + latency = dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level]; > > > + > > > + if (intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(intel_state) && > > > + plane->base.state->fb->modifier[0] == > > > + I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) > > > + latency += 15; > > > + > > > /* > > > * If any of the planes on this pipe don't > > > enable > > > wm > > > levels > > > * that incur memory latencies higher then 30µs > > > we > > > can't enable > > > * the SAGV > > > */ > > > - if (dev_priv->wm.skl_latency[level] < > > > SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) > > > + if (latency < SKL_SAGV_BLOCK_TIME) > > > return false; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -3549,12 +3574,18 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const > > > struct > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > uint32_t width = 0, height = 0; > > > uint32_t plane_pixel_rate; > > > uint32_t y_tile_minimum, y_min_scanlines; > > > + struct intel_atomic_state *state = > > > + to_intel_atomic_state(cstate->base.state); > > > + bool apply_memory_bw_wa = > > > intel_needs_memory_bw_wa(state); > > > > > > if (latency == 0 || !cstate->base.active || > > > !intel_pstate- > > > > > > > > > > > > base.visible) { > > > *enabled = false; > > > return 0; > > > } > > > > > > + if (apply_memory_bw_wa && fb->modifier[0] == > > > I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED) > > > + latency += 15; > > > + > > > width = drm_rect_width(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; > > > height = drm_rect_height(&intel_pstate->base.src) >> 16; > > > > > > @@ -3607,6 +3638,8 @@ static int skl_compute_plane_wm(const > > > struct > > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > > plane_blocks_per_line); > > > > > > y_tile_minimum = plane_blocks_per_line * > > > y_min_scanlines; > > > + if (apply_memory_bw_wa) > > > + y_tile_minimum *= 2; > > > > > > if (fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Y_TILED || > > > fb->modifier[0] == I915_FORMAT_MOD_Yf_TILED) { _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
