On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 05:16:17PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 07/10/2016 17:12, Chris Wilson wrote: > >>2. Can child be another array? > >Yes, but we don't want to recurse (or at least need to bound the > >recursion). > > In that case could the array have been created in the signal_on_any > mode and how would we handle that? Hmm. Not along our paths, I think. The only fence-array we have are from sync-file which are signal-on-all (except... in the case of where it wraps a single fence, that fence could be a composite). signal-on-any is icky, to be complete we should not decompose it into its elements - however, whether or not a fence-array is operating in signal_on_any mode is not stored. So at the moment, the best I can do is offer a comment. The only user of it at the moment is amdgpu waiting for the first of many VM manager to become available, not something we'll see immediately via sync-file. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
