On 06/10/16 13:30, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 12:59:17PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> >> On 26/09/16 19:30, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> >>> The global mode_config.rotation_property is going away, switch over to >>> per-plane rotation_property. >>> >>> Not sure I got the annoying crtc rotation_property handling right. >>> Might work, or migth not. >>> >>> v2: Drop the BIT() >>> Don't create rotation property twice for each primary plane >>> >>> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> >>> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@xxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>> index 6ddaa5ea4b6b..b272f810989e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c >>> @@ -211,9 +211,16 @@ void omap_plane_install_properties(struct drm_plane *plane, >>> struct omap_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private; >>> >>> if (priv->has_dmm) { >>> - struct drm_property *prop = dev->mode_config.rotation_property; >>> - >>> - drm_object_attach_property(obj, prop, DRM_ROTATE_0); >>> + if (!plane->rotation_property) >>> + drm_plane_create_rotation_property(plane, >>> + DRM_ROTATE_0, >>> + DRM_ROTATE_0 | DRM_ROTATE_90 | >>> + DRM_ROTATE_180 | DRM_ROTATE_270 | >>> + DRM_REFLECT_X | DRM_REFLECT_Y); >>> + >>> + if (plane->rotation_property && obj != &plane->base) >>> + drm_object_attach_property(obj, plane->rotation_property, >>> + DRM_ROTATE_0); >> >> I think this could use a short comment, as it's not obvious wth is going >> on here =). > > /* Attach the rotation property also to the crtc object */ ? Yes, sounds fine to me. Tomi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx