On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 11:07:17AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > At least when testing the kernel. In normal programs pretty much all > the dmesg noise would simply be replaced by debug asserts, but in the > kernel we try rely hard to not fall over minor inconsistencies. > > Still for CI purposes there's not really a difference, hence don't > treat it as such. > > Motivated since once again I've seen a statistics where this was split > up, and then a reduction of "failures" (but in reality just trading > them in for more "warnings") praised as success. Hear, hear! dfail == fail, and dwarn == warn. Calling a failure, a dfail just softens that it failed. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
