On 04/10/2016 09:55, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 09:46:50AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 03/10/2016 10:27, Patchwork wrote:
fi-bdw-5557u total:236 pass:220 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:15
fi-bxt-t5700 total:236 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30
fi-byt-j1900 total:236 pass:202 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:31
fi-byt-n2820 total:245 pass:208 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:35
fi-hsw-4770 total:236 pass:213 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:22
fi-hsw-4770r total:245 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:22
fi-ilk-650 total:236 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:60
fi-skl-6700k total:236 pass:209 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
fi-skl-6770hq total:245 pass:228 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:14
fi-snb-2520m total:245 pass:208 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:36
fi-snb-2600 total:236 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:37
fi-ivb-3520m failed to connect after reboot
fi-ivb-3770 failed to collect. IGT log at Patchwork_2612/fi-ivb-3770/igt.log
fi-skl-6260u failed to collect. IGT log at Patchwork_2612/fi-skl-6260u/igt.log
fi-skl-6700hq failed to collect. IGT log at Patchwork_2612/fi-skl-6700hq/igt.log
Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/Patchwork_2612/
d0534bd0217c83c083ba146b9c987e19b219e0e4 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-09m-30d-10h-31m-00s UTC integration manifest
c5237e5 drm/i915: Inline binary search
9b4e3c9 drm/i915: Use binary search when looking for shadowed registers
0b12dbd drm/i915: Sort the shadow register table
7978e69 drm/i915: Remove identical write mmmio functions
b0960d1 drm/i915: Remove identical mmio read functions
354b09a drm/i915: Remove identical macros
e608845 drm/i915: Store the active forcewake range table pointer
79f3cb4 drm/i915: Eliminate Gen9 special case
7fe1499 drm/i915: Use binary search when looking up forcewake domains
1a71a14 drm/i915: Sort forcewake mapping tables
d34328e drm/i915: Data driven register to forcewake domains lookup
82e0e23 drm/i915: Do not inline forcewake taking in mmio accessors
920037b drm/i915: Keep track of active forcewake domains in a bitmask
e6741b5 drm/i915: Remove redundant hsw_write* mmio functions
Results look good. If everyone is happy we could merge this.
Hmm, ivb a sporadic fail? That both died is a bit concerning, but
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/13264/ is happy, right?
Yes, and also they did not both die, one was just over the allocated
time for the run. Same with the two SKLs. So perhaps we are close to the
cut off with the whole suite again.
Lgtm.
Cool, thanks.
Joonas what do you think, worth merging on balance?
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
