Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: Simplify logging macros, convert DRM_NOTE to DRM_NOTICE

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27 September 2016 at 17:43, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 17:36 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 27 September 2016 at 17:04, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 11:58 -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>> > > On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > > Use a bit more consistent style with kernel loglevels
>> > > I'm not convinced this is worth doing if we're going to keep the
>> > > WARN/WARNING discrepancy, and I don't think we should switch DRM_WARN
>> > > to DRM_WARNING since it's so widely used.
>> > There is no DRM_WARN inconsistency.
>> DRM_WARN is to DRM_WARNING like DRM_INFO is to DRM_INFORMATION and
>> DRM_NOTE is to DRM_NOTICE...
>
> DRM_INFORMATION doesn't exist in the kernel tree.
>
>> is what I'm thinking and seemingly so
>> does Sean. Fwiw that part seem cosmetic/unrelated to the rest of the
>> patch, so it might be worth keeping separate ?
>
> To me, simplifying the macro means using the common kernel
> macro forms.
>
"unify" might be better, but I agree.

Either way there's no point in elaborating on the point me(Sean?)
meant since it's just going to get shoot down like a dog ;-)

Regards,
Emil
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux