> > > From: Zanoni, Paulo R > > Em Sex, 2016-09-16 às 16:59 +0300, Jani Nikula escreveu: > > > Only production steppings are supported, drop workarounds for > > > anything else. The series is split by revision so we can bikeshed if > > > there are steppings some people still need to use for some reason. > > > > Bikeshed: in patches 2 and 3 you could have added platform tags to the > > workaround tags, while also adding the missing space to a > > /* comment*/. > > > > Jani S., Yann: perhaps we could try to check if our CI/QA systems > > still have these machines? Just "lspci -nn | grep VGA" on the SKL > > systems and check whether rev <= 5. > > The CI system doesn't have any pre-production SKL machines. They were > dropped as soon as we got production machines. On QA side, we have mainly switched to production machines here and remaining RVP is > 5. Yann > > Tomi > > > If we conclude our CI system doesn't include these machines: > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Jani Nikula (5): > > > drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for A0 and B0 revisions > > > drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for C0 revision > > > drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for D0 revision > > > drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for E0 revision > > > drm/i915/skl: drop workarounds for F0 revision > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 4 -- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp_link_training.c | 3 -- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_loader.c | 8 ++-- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 23 +++++------ > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 3 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 58 +++++---------- > > > ------------ > > > 6 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-) _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
