On Tue, 20 Sep 2016, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:57:06AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016, Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On to, 2016-09-15 at 16:28 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >> Fix sparse warnings: >> >> >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1179:5: warning: symbol >> >> 'i915_driver_load' was not declared. Should it be static? >> >> >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:1267:6: warning: symbol >> >> 'i915_driver_unload' was not declared. Should it be static? >> >> >> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c:2444:25: warning: symbol 'i915_pm_ops' >> >> was not declared. Should it be static? >> >> >> > >> > Hmm, Chris, were not these change in the middle of a series, did the >> > cleanup patches just fall off? >> >> Can we just please use whichever patches that fix the issue? > > It was deliberate placement to avoid having those symbols exposed to > every user of i915_drv.h, i.e. everyone. Limit i915_drv.h to the > interface exposed by i915_drv.c and so used only by a handful of files. I can see that, but I prefer to get the warnings gone. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
