Re: [PATCH i-g-t v5 06/13] tests/sw_sync: Add subtest test_sync_wait

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 02:40:11PM -0400, robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This subtest verifies that waiting on fences works properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Foss <robert.foss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tests/sw_sync.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/sw_sync.c b/tests/sw_sync.c
> index fcb2f57..3061279 100644
> --- a/tests/sw_sync.c
> +++ b/tests/sw_sync.c
> @@ -81,6 +81,41 @@ static void test_alloc_merge_fence(void)
>  	close(timeline[1]);
>  }
>  
> +static void test_sync_wait(void)

These are not testing waits but busy queries.

static void test_sync_busy(void)
> +{
> +	int fence, ret;
> +	int timeline;
> +
> +	timeline = sw_sync_timeline_create();
> +	fence = sw_sync_fence_create(timeline, 5);
> +
> +	/* Wait on fence until timeout */

Misleading comment

> +	ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +	igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");

igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Fence created in an unexpectedly signaled state\n");

> +
> +	/* Advance timeline from 0 -> 1 */
> +	sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 1);
> +
> +	/* Wait on fence until timeout */
> +	ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +	igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Failure waiting on fence until timeout\n");

igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Fence signaled earlier (timeline value 1, fence seqno 5)\n");

> +
> +	/* Signal the fence */

/* Advance timeline from 1 -> 5: signaling the fence (seqno 5)*/
> +	sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 4);

> +
> +	/* Wait successfully */

Usless comment

> +	ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +	igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure waiting on fence\n");

igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Fence not signaled (timeline value 5, fence seqno 5)\n");

If we have a timeline info, we could use %d to say the current value.

Another test would be to then

seqno = 0;
for (i = 0; i < n_primes; i++) {
	seqno += primes[i];
	sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, primes[i]);
	igt_assert_eq(sw_sync_timeline_get_seqno(timeline), seqno);
}

> +
> +	/* Go even further, and confirm wait still succeeds */
> +	sw_sync_timeline_inc(timeline, 10);
> +	ret = sw_sync_wait(fence, 0);
> +	igt_assert_f(ret > 0, "Failure waiting ahead\n");

igt_assert_f(ret == 0, "Fence now not signaled! (timeline value 10, fence seqno 5)\n");

> +
> +	close(fence);
> +	close(timeline);
> +}

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux