On ke, 2016-09-14 at 07:52 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Since we only use the more generic unlocked variant, just rename it as > the normal i915_gem_active_wait(). The temporary cost is that we need to > always acquire the reference in a RCU safe manner, but the benefit is > that we will combine the common paths. > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Joonas -- Joonas Lahtinen Open Source Technology Center Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx