On Mon, 05 Sep 2016, Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/09/16 16:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: >> On 12/08/16 13:06, Dave Gordon wrote: >>> On 11/08/16 18:35, Patchwork wrote: >>>> == Series Details == >>>> >>>> Series: Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission (rev3) >>>> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10918/ >>>> State : failure >>>> >>>> == Summary == >>>> >>>> Series 10918v3 Reclassify messages from GuC loader/submission >>>> http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10918/revisions/3/mbox >>>> >>>> Test gem_exec_suspend: >>>> Subgroup basic-s3: >>>> dmesg-warn -> PASS (ro-bdw-i7-5600u) >>>> Test kms_cursor_legacy: >>>> Subgroup basic-cursor-vs-flip-varying-size: >>>> pass -> FAIL (ro-ilk1-i5-650) >>> >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96701 >>> [ILK/BSW/APL] [BAT] kms_cursor_legacy some subtest fail with WARNING: >>> page flip 1 was delayed, missed 23 frames etc. >>> >>>> Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-legacy: >>>> fail -> PASS (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) >>>> Test kms_pipe_crc_basic: >>>> Subgroup read-crc-pipe-b-frame-sequence: >>>> fail -> PASS (ro-ivb2-i7-3770) >>>> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-a: >>>> dmesg-warn -> SKIP (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) >>>> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-b: >>>> skip -> DMESG-WARN (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) >>>> Subgroup suspend-read-crc-pipe-c: >>>> skip -> DMESG-WARN (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) >>> >>> Both of these are >>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96614 >>> [BAT BDW] *ERROR* failed to enable link training/failed to start channel >>> equalization >>> >>>> ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:240 pass:219 dwarn:3 dfail:0 fail:1 >>>> skip:17 >>>> ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:240 pass:220 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 >>>> skip:19 >>>> ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:240 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 >>>> skip:32 >>>> ro-bsw-n3050 total:240 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 >>>> skip:42 >>>> ro-byt-n2820 total:240 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:3 >>>> skip:40 >>>> ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:240 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 >>>> skip:26 >>>> ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:240 pass:185 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 >>>> skip:55 >>>> ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:235 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 >>>> skip:60 >>>> ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:240 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 >>>> skip:35 >>>> ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:240 pass:209 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 >>>> skip:31 >>>> ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:240 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 >>>> skip:14 >>>> >>>> Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1841/ >>>> >>>> 4a26251 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-11d-16h-12m-42s UTC integration >>>> manifest >>>> 773b608 NOMERGE: next version of GuC firmware is 8.11 >>>> e3208ac drm/i915/guc: revisit GuC loader message levels >>>> 3dc113a drm/i915/guc: downgrade some DRM_ERROR() messages to DRM_WARN() >>>> 6cd71c4 drm: extra printk() wrapper macros >>> >>> So ready for merging :) >> >> Merged to dinq, thanks for patches and review! > > I've merged the wrong (old) series. :( > > So now those three patches need to be removed from dinq. Am I allowed to > just pull back the head and force push? Or push reverts? No force pushes. Either revert and push the right ones, or, if the diff is reasonable, come up with fixes that have the same end result. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
