Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Reattach comment, complete type specification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:23:42PM +0100, Dave Gordon wrote:
> In the recent patch
> bc3d674 drm/i915: Allow userspace to request no-error-capture upon ...
> the final version moved the flags and the associated #defines around
> so they were adjacent; unfortunately, they ended up between a comment
> and the thing (hw_id) to which the comment applies :(
> 
> So this patch reshuffles the comment and subject back together.
> 
> Also, as we're touching 'hw_id', let's change it from just 'unsigned'
> to a fully-specified 'unsigned int', because some code checking tools
> (including checkpatch) object to plain 'unsigned'.
> 
> Fixes: bc3d674462e5df5f2b33adbfcaad9edff8b827f4

You mention checkpatch and then use a commit sha that will annoy it ;)
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux