On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 11:41:39AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > On su, 2016-08-07 at 15:45 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > @@ -771,6 +771,13 @@ static int do_rcs_switch(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req) > > if (skip_rcs_switch(ppgtt, engine, to)) > > return 0; > > > > + if (!(to->engine[RCS].state->flags & I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND)) { > > + ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(to->engine[RCS].state->obj, > > + false); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > /* Trying to pin first makes error handling easier. */ > > ret = i915_vma_pin(to->engine[RCS].state, > > 0, to->ggtt_alignment, > > This could be lifted inside the if? I'd rather not as that would be more unusual and we would then need a complicated error path. If the compiler is feeling intelligent it could combine the two blocks into one, i.e. if (unlikely((++vma->flags ^ flags) & I915_VMA_BIND_MASK)) { ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(vma->obj, false); if (ret) return ret; ret = __i915_vma_do_pin(vma, size, alignment, flags); if (ret) return ret; } I don't suggest we do the expansion ourselves, and I don't have a bit to spare in the PIN_FLAGS. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx