On 09/08/16 03:59, Dave Airlie wrote:
On 8 August 2016 at 19:40, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:31:32AM +0100, David Binderman wrote:
Hello there,
Recent versions of gcc say this:
include/drm/i915_drm.h:96:34: warning: result of ‘65535 << 20’
requires 37 bits to represent, but ‘int’ only has 32 bits
[-Wshift-overflow=]
Source code is
#define INTEL_BSM_MASK (0xFFFF << 20)
Maybe something like
#define INTEL_BSM_MASK (0xFFFFUL<< 20)
might be better.
Yup. Care to bake this into a patch (with s-o-b and everything per
Documentation/SubmittingPatches) so I can apply it?
Why would you want to apply a clearly incorrect patch :-)
INTEL_BSM_MASK is used in one place, on a 32-bit number
I'm not sure what it needs to be, but a 64-bit number it doesn't.
Dave.
I found two uses, but in both cases it's masking a value read
from a 32-bit PCI register, so it can just be (-(1 << 20)).
.Dave.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
