On 8 August 2016 at 19:40, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 10:31:32AM +0100, David Binderman wrote: >> Hello there, >> >> Recent versions of gcc say this: >> >> include/drm/i915_drm.h:96:34: warning: result of ‘65535 << 20’ >> requires 37 bits to represent, but ‘int’ only has 32 bits >> [-Wshift-overflow=] >> >> Source code is >> >> #define INTEL_BSM_MASK (0xFFFF << 20) >> >> Maybe something like >> >> #define INTEL_BSM_MASK (0xFFFFUL<< 20) >> >> might be better. > > Yup. Care to bake this into a patch (with s-o-b and everything per > Documentation/SubmittingPatches) so I can apply it? Why would you want to apply a clearly incorrect patch :-) INTEL_BSM_MASK is used in one place, on a 32-bit number I'm not sure what it needs to be, but a 64-bit number it doesn't. Dave. _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx