On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:16:09AM -0000, Patchwork wrote: > == Series Details == > > Series: drm/i915: Don't mark PCH underrun reporting as diasabled for transcoder B/C on LPT-H > URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10726/ > State : failure > > == Summary == > > Series 10726v1 drm/i915: Don't mark PCH underrun reporting as diasabled for transcoder B/C on LPT-H > http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/10726/revisions/1/mbox > > Test drv_module_reload_basic: > pass -> DMESG-WARN (ro-hsw-i7-4770r) [ 134.371594] ============================================= [ 134.371596] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] [ 134.371599] 4.7.0-gfxbench-RO_Patchwork_1736+ #1 Tainted: G U [ 134.371601] --------------------------------------------- [ 134.371604] rmmod/6305 is trying to acquire lock: [ 134.371607] (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811ca177>] get_partial_node.isra.23+0x47/0x430 [ 134.371617] but task is already holding lock: [ 134.371619] (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811cd56c>] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x5c/0x360 [ 134.371636] other info that might help us debug this: [ 134.371638] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 134.371652] CPU0 [ 134.371653] ---- [ 134.371654] lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock); [ 134.371656] lock(&(&n->list_lock)->rlock); [ 134.371658] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 134.371662] May be due to missing lock nesting notation [ 134.371666] 5 locks held by rmmod/6305: [ 134.371668] #0: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff8152d9c2>] driver_detach+0x42/0xc0 [ 134.371676] #1: (&dev->mutex){......}, at: [<ffffffff8152d9d0>] driver_detach+0x50/0xc0 [ 134.371682] #2: (cpu_hotplug.dep_map){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8107e0cd>] get_online_cpus+0x2d/0x80 [ 134.371689] #3: (slab_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81197c0c>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x3c/0x220 [ 134.371696] #4: (&(&n->list_lock)->rlock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff811cd56c>] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x5c/0x360 [ 134.371702] stack backtrace: [ 134.371705] CPU: 1 PID: 6305 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G U 4.7.0-gfxbench-RO_Patchwork_1736+ #1 [ 134.371710] Hardware name: GIGABYTE M4HM87P-00/M4HM87P-00, BIOS F6 12/10/2014 [ 134.371713] 0000000000000000 ffff8802057137f0 ffffffff8141c765 ffffffff82596890 [ 134.371718] ffffffff82596890 ffff8802057138b0 ffffffff810d5914 ffff8801e5ac4eb8 [ 134.371722] 000000001480ef00 ffff88021483c240 ffff880200000005 ffffffff0000b700 [ 134.371727] Call Trace: [ 134.371731] [<ffffffff8141c765>] dump_stack+0x67/0x92 [ 134.371735] [<ffffffff810d5914>] __lock_acquire+0x1544/0x1930 [ 134.371763] [<ffffffffa03c58ba>] ? i915_exit+0x1a/0x1ec [i915] [ 134.371780] [<ffffffffa03c58ba>] ? i915_exit+0x1a/0x1ec [i915] [ 134.371785] [<ffffffff810ea570>] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x70/0x80 [ 134.371789] [<ffffffff810ea4fd>] ? debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled+0x1d/0x20 [ 134.371793] [<ffffffff810d6122>] lock_acquire+0xb2/0x200 [ 134.371797] [<ffffffff811ca177>] ? get_partial_node.isra.23+0x47/0x430 [ 134.371801] [<ffffffff817c4566>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x50 [ 134.371805] [<ffffffff811ca177>] ? get_partial_node.isra.23+0x47/0x430 [ 134.371808] [<ffffffff811ca177>] get_partial_node.isra.23+0x47/0x430 [ 134.371813] [<ffffffff8110f837>] ? __module_address+0x27/0xf0 [ 134.371829] [<ffffffffa03c58ba>] ? i915_exit+0x1a/0x1ec [i915] [ 134.371833] [<ffffffff8110f90d>] ? __module_text_address+0xd/0x60 [ 134.371837] [<ffffffff8111339a>] ? is_module_text_address+0x2a/0x50 [ 134.371840] [<ffffffff8109f294>] ? __kernel_text_address+0x34/0x60 [ 134.371845] [<ffffffff8101ef86>] ? print_context_stack+0x76/0xe0 [ 134.371848] [<ffffffff8101e737>] ? dump_trace+0x117/0x300 [ 134.371852] [<ffffffff811ca9b7>] ___slab_alloc.constprop.26+0x217/0x390 [ 134.371857] [<ffffffff81439e11>] ? __debug_object_init+0x2f1/0x410 [ 134.371861] [<ffffffff810d2187>] ? add_lock_to_list.isra.9.constprop.27+0x77/0xc0 [ 134.371866] [<ffffffff810d56ae>] ? __lock_acquire+0x12de/0x1930 [ 134.371870] [<ffffffff81439e11>] ? __debug_object_init+0x2f1/0x410 [ 134.371873] [<ffffffff811cab73>] __slab_alloc.isra.21.constprop.25+0x43/0x80 [ 134.371877] [<ffffffff81439e11>] ? __debug_object_init+0x2f1/0x410 [ 134.371881] [<ffffffff811cadf1>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x241/0x2f0 [ 134.371885] [<ffffffff81439e11>] __debug_object_init+0x2f1/0x410 [ 134.371889] [<ffffffff8143a0c6>] debug_object_activate+0x156/0x1e0 [ 134.371892] [<ffffffff811ca560>] ? get_partial_node.isra.23+0x430/0x430 [ 134.371896] [<ffffffff810edfd1>] __call_rcu.constprop.60+0x31/0x2f0 [ 134.371900] [<ffffffff810ee2a2>] call_rcu+0x12/0x20 [ 134.371904] [<ffffffff811c951d>] discard_slab+0x3d/0x40 [ 134.371907] [<ffffffff811cd5d7>] __kmem_cache_shutdown+0xc7/0x360 [ 134.371911] [<ffffffff817c06af>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x27f/0x3b0 [ 134.371915] [<ffffffff811971a9>] shutdown_cache+0x19/0x60 [ 134.371918] [<ffffffff81197d7e>] kmem_cache_destroy+0x1ae/0x220 [ 134.371933] [<ffffffffa0340ae4>] i915_gem_load_cleanup+0x14/0x40 [i915] [ 134.371943] [<ffffffffa02fffe1>] i915_driver_unload+0x151/0x180 [i915] [ 134.371953] [<ffffffffa030a124>] i915_pci_remove+0x14/0x20 [i915] [ 134.371958] [<ffffffff814673e4>] pci_device_remove+0x34/0xb0 [ 134.371963] [<ffffffff8152ce6c>] __device_release_driver+0x9c/0x150 [ 134.371967] [<ffffffff8152da36>] driver_detach+0xb6/0xc0 [ 134.371971] [<ffffffff8152c883>] bus_remove_driver+0x53/0xd0 [ 134.371974] [<ffffffff8152e4f7>] driver_unregister+0x27/0x50 [ 134.371977] [<ffffffff81466465>] pci_unregister_driver+0x25/0x70 [ 134.371994] [<ffffffffa03c58ba>] i915_exit+0x1a/0x1ec [i915] [ 134.371998] [<ffffffff81110329>] SyS_delete_module+0x199/0x1f0 [ 134.372002] [<ffffffff817c50a9>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0xac Unrelated to this patch, and people seem to be looking into it already. > Test kms_cursor_legacy: > Subgroup basic-cursor-vs-flip-varying-size: > pass -> FAIL (ro-ilk1-i5-650) (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: target > 1 (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) DEBUG: Using a target of 32 cursor updates per half-vblank (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) WARNING: page flip 0 was delayed, missed 1 frames (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) WARNING: page flip 1 was delayed, missed 1 frames (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) WARNING: page flip 3 was delayed, missed 1 frames (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_cursor_vs_flip, file kms_cursor_legacy.c:670: (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: vbl.sequence == vblank_start + 60 (kms_cursor_legacy:8166) CRITICAL: error: 11425 != 11422 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96701 > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-legacy: > fail -> PASS (ro-byt-n2820) > fail -> PASS (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) > pass -> FAIL (ro-skl3-i5-6260u) (kms_cursor_legacy:9330) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: target > 1 (kms_cursor_legacy:9330) DEBUG: Using a target of 64 cursor updates per half-vblank (kms_cursor_legacy:9330) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_flip_vs_cursor, file kms_cursor_legacy.c:514: (kms_cursor_legacy:9330) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: get_vblank(display->drm_fd, pipe, 0) == vblank_start (kms_cursor_legacy:9330) CRITICAL: error: 12169 != 12168 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97188 > Subgroup basic-flip-vs-cursor-varying-size: > pass -> FAIL (ro-snb-i7-2620M) (kms_cursor_legacy:7948) DEBUG: Test requirement passed: target > 1 (kms_cursor_legacy:7948) DEBUG: Using a target of 64 cursor updates per half-vblank (kms_cursor_legacy:7948) CRITICAL: Test assertion failure function basic_flip_vs_cursor, file kms_cursor_legacy.c:514: (kms_cursor_legacy:7948) CRITICAL: Failed assertion: get_vblank(display->drm_fd, pipe, 0) == vblank_start (kms_cursor_legacy:7948) CRITICAL: error: 13766 != 13765 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97188 > fail -> PASS (ro-bdw-i5-5250u) > > fi-kbl-qkkr total:244 pass:185 dwarn:29 dfail:0 fail:3 skip:27 > ro-bdw-i5-5250u total:240 pass:220 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 > ro-bdw-i7-5557U total:240 pass:224 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:16 > ro-bdw-i7-5600u total:240 pass:207 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:32 > ro-bsw-n3050 total:240 pass:194 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:42 > ro-byt-n2820 total:240 pass:198 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:40 > ro-hsw-i3-4010u total:240 pass:214 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > ro-hsw-i7-4770r total:240 pass:213 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 > ro-ilk-i7-620lm total:240 pass:173 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:65 > ro-ilk1-i5-650 total:235 pass:173 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:60 > ro-ivb-i7-3770 total:240 pass:205 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 > ro-ivb2-i7-3770 total:240 pass:209 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:31 > ro-skl3-i5-6260u total:240 pass:222 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:4 skip:14 > ro-snb-i7-2620M total:240 pass:197 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:2 skip:41 > > Results at /archive/results/CI_IGT_test/RO_Patchwork_1736/ > > b834992 drm-intel-nightly: 2016y-08m-05d-20h-40m-44s UTC integration manifest > d24b0aa drm/i915: Don't mark PCH underrun reporting as diasabled for transcoder B/C on LPT-H -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
