From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
intel_enable_pipe() looks rather confusing when one side doesn't have
the curly braces, and the other one does. And what's even worse,
there's another if-else inside the braceless side. Let's put braces
around it to make it clear which branch goes where.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 9cbf5431c1e3..ddae54ad4ac8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -1959,12 +1959,12 @@ static void intel_enable_pipe(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
* a plane. On ILK+ the pipe PLLs are integrated, so we don't
* need the check.
*/
- if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv))
+ if (HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv)) {
if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc->config, INTEL_OUTPUT_DSI))
assert_dsi_pll_enabled(dev_priv);
else
assert_pll_enabled(dev_priv, pipe);
- else {
+ } else {
if (crtc->config->has_pch_encoder) {
/* if driving the PCH, we need FDI enabled */
assert_fdi_rx_pll_enabled(dev_priv, pch_transcoder);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
