On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:28:36 +0100, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote: > Half of the users actually don't want just no tracing, but need to > avoid the forcewake dance for correctness. So add new variants > __I915_READ and __I915_WRITE for that. I'd sure like something more descriptive than '__' here. Perhaps I915_READ_NOWAKE? Or even I915_READ_NO_FORCEWAKE? -- keith.packard at intel.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 827 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20111222/4212a760/attachment.pgp>
