On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:23:43AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> On ke, 2016-07-27 at 12:14 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> > + if (i915_vma_misplaced(vma, size, alignment, flags)) {
> > + if (flags & PIN_NONBLOCK &&
> > + (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma) || i915_vma_is_active(vma)))
> > + return -ENOSPC;
>
> Why ENOSPC when active? Would not EAGAIN be more appropriate?
The interface used by execbuf that PIN_NONBLOCK results in ENOSPC. That
allows us to do a trial-and-error pass with ENOSPC being resolved later
and all the others going back to userspace, primarily EIO, EAGAIN, EINTR,
EINVAL. On the second pass we drop the NONBLOCK and if were a genuine
failure, it will result in ENOSPC again.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
