On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 05:50:45PM +0300, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > No need to iterate the rates array in intel_dp_max_link_rate(). We know > the max rate will be the last entry, and we already know the size. > > Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jim Bride <jim.bride@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Manasi D Navare <manasi.d.navare@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Yeah, that's some rather convoluted logic. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > index d1dd351682d2..40cae6202160 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ intel_dp_max_link_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > if (WARN_ON(len <= 0)) > return 162000; > > - return rates[rate_to_index(0, rates) - 1]; > + return rates[len - 1]; > } > > int intel_dp_rate_select(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, int rate) > -- > 2.7.4 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
