On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 07:30:46AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 09:11:31AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote: > > On ke, 2016-07-27 at 19:32 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > The merge conflict resolution caused some dev->dev_private to return > > > from the dead. Kill them with to_i915(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c | 2 +- > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 4 ++-- > > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c > > > index d47281b4b1c1..f1ffde7f7c0b 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c > > > @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_boost_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev, > > > { > > > struct drm_minor *minor = dev_to_drm_minor(kdev); > > > struct drm_device *dev = minor->dev; > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > > u32 val; > > > ssize_t ret; > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > index a807e1045b1d..94f41e72cf52 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > > @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ > > > > > > static void gen9_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev) > > > { > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > > > > > /* See Bspec note for PSR2_CTL bit 31, Wa#828:skl,bxt,kbl */ > > > I915_WRITE(CHICKEN_PAR1_1, > > > @@ -7056,7 +7056,7 @@ static void kabylake_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev) > > > > > > static void skylake_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev) > > > { > > > - struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private; > > > + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > > > > > gen9_init_clock_gating(dev); > > > > > Hmm, Daniel these are actually somewhere between drm-intel-next-queued > and drm-intel-nightly. Probably simpler if we just wait for the eventual > merge and fix up any residual afterwards. Yup, I plan to backmerge drm-next as soon as Dave finalizes the 4.8 pull request. We need to sync up a bit ;-) -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx