Re: [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/tdr: Update reset_in_progress to account for engine reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/07/2016 22:52, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 05:40:49PM +0100, Arun Siluvery wrote:
Now that we track reset progress using separate set of flags, update it to
account for engine reset as well.

A bit corresponding engine->id is set if reset is in progress for that
engine. Bit0 is for full gpu reset.

Signed-off-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 11436e7..125fafa 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1403,6 +1403,8 @@ struct i915_gpu_error {
  #define I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS	0
  #define I915_WEDGED		(BITS_PER_LONG-1)

+	unsigned long engine_reset_count[I915_NUM_ENGINES];
+
  	/**
  	 * Waitqueue to signal when a hang is detected. Used to for waiters
  	 * to release the struct_mutex for the reset to procede.
@@ -3194,9 +3196,10 @@ i915_gem_find_active_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
  void i915_gem_retire_requests(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
  void i915_gem_retire_requests_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);

+/* indicates the progress of engine reset or full gpu reset */
  static inline bool i915_reset_in_progress(struct i915_gpu_error *error)
  {
-	return test_bit(I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS, &error->flags);
+	return unlikely(READ_ONCE(error->flags) & ~BIT(I915_WEDGED));
  }

  static inline bool i915_terminally_wedged(struct i915_gpu_error *error)
@@ -3214,6 +3217,17 @@ static inline u32 i915_reset_count(struct i915_gpu_error *error)
  	return READ_ONCE(error->reset_count);
  }

+static inline bool i915_full_gpu_reset_in_progress(struct i915_gpu_error *error)
+{
+	return test_bit(I915_RESET_IN_PROGRESS, &error->flags);
+}
+
+static inline bool i915_engine_reset_in_progress(struct i915_gpu_error *error,
+						 struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	return test_bit(engine->id + 1, &error->flags);
+}

?

A totally unexplained change. If it is because you think to want to break
waiters on struct_mutex, try again.
So you don't want error->flags to include engine reset bits?
ok, it should be possible to use engine_mask itself.

Next patch separates engine reset and full gpu reset in separate functions, for branching purposes i915_full_gpu_reset_in_progress() is added, is this ok or directly use test_bit() ?

regards
Arun


-Chris


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux