On Fri, May 11, 2018, at 14:25, Sebastian Hagedorn wrote: > --On 11. Mai 2018 um 13:32:29 +0200 Robert Stepanek <rsto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > For non-FUZZY text SEARCH, Cyrus attempts to match the string on its own > > [1]. > > That sounds strange to me, because Cyrus 2.4 and earlier don't support > FUZZY, and there the SQUAT index was used, if present. Only messages that > were added after the last squatter run were searched directly. Why would > that have changed? Right, it hasn't. SQUAT is still the backend for non-FUZZY text search. > I think if Xapian only does fuzzy, some searches may be *slower* than using > a SQUAT index. That seems counterintuitive, at the least. Do you have > internal search benchmarks? Without metrics it's hard to say if any of this > actually matters ... I don't know of any benchmarks for this. It hasn't popped up as a performance issue. Cheers, Robert ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
