|
On 10/02/2015 10:53 AM, Gabriele Bulfon
wrote:
Nice, it's not a big deal for us to
upgrade to new versions, surely easier than porting to
Dovecot! ;)
So, maybe we can help with the implementation.
In my mind, it's almost about changing the
"thread=reference" and let it omit the subject matching,
change sorting
and...maybe just this? How much hard do
you think it is?
That sounds about right from what I remember of THREAD=REFERENCES
(which I co-authored and implemented) and THREAD=REFS (which I think
was last documented in 2010).
Da:
Bron Gondwana <brong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
A: info-cyrus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Data: 2 ottobre 2015 12.59.08 CEST
Oggetto: Re: thread=refs
No, there isn't. The conversations work in 3.0 beta
contains a lot of what would be required to efficiently
implement THREAD=REFS, but nobody has done the work to
implement it.
It certainly will never be backported to the 2.4 series,
which is only getting security updates and fixes for major
bugs now.
Regards,
Bron.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015, at 18:40, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi,
we have systems running cyrus 2.4.12, where thread
algorithms are only references and orderedsubject.
Is there support for the thread=refs algorithm?
Thanks
Gabriele
----
To Unsubscribe:
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
--
Kenneth Murchison
Principal Systems Software Engineer
Carnegie Mellon University
|
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
