Re: Another 2.4 upgrade horror story

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



--On 26. September 2012 09:42:17 +0300 Janne Peltonen <janne.peltonen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

As it happened, we didn't have any trouble with the reconstruction of any
mailboxes, the process went flawlessly - it was just slow.

Same here.

Also, it did
cause observable slowness only because at first, I hadn't reconstructed
the mailboxes systematically but had trusted the system to do it on
demand. After the business day and daily peak usage was over, I set up
such a number of reconstruction processes that the system didn't choke on
them, and everything (~60k mailboxes) was reconstructed before next
morning.

We did it systematically from the start, but that wasn't enough.
--
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-W (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
.:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.

Attachment: p7sRNKpWb_G6a.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

----
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
To Unsubscribe:
https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux