Hi! On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 03:25:45PM +0200, Wolfgang Breyha wrote: > Sebastian Hagedorn wrote, on 25.09.2012 14:01: > > I realize that some of our problems were caused by infrastructure that's > > not up to current standards, but nonetheless I would really urge you to > > never again use an upgrade mechanism like that. Give admins a chance to > > upgrade indexes in the background and over time. > > There is such an upgrade path using a murder environment and moving mailboxes > between backends. We used that for our 150k user infrastructure and had no IO > headaches at all. It was a good moment to update distribution, filesystems, > hardware, .... as well. Could you elaborate on that? I considered that option, but seeing as moving even a couple dozen users from a backend to another using RENAME takes hours and one backend contains thousands of users, I decided to just live with the ~1 day of unbearable slowness. Or do you know of a fast way? --Janne -- Janne Peltonen <janne.peltonen@xxxxxxxxxxx> PGP Key ID: 0x9CFAC88B ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
