On 07/30/2012 03:07 AM, Greg Banks wrote: > I should mention also that Bron has been talking for some time now about > storing modseqs on per-message annotations as a way to make replication > more efficient. I think this is an excellent idea and is easy enough to > do, because we have a good modseq counter with sensible semantics for > the mailbox and could store it in the db in a semi backwards compatible > manner, and the CONDSTORE rfc allows for servers to keep separate > modseqs on any kind of per-message data. Once we do that, it would be > relatively easy to emit unsolicited ANNOTATION responses. > > It might be feasible to do similar things for per-mailbox annotations. > But per-server annotations are...less obvious. Well, at first glance and without knowing the Cyrus code and architecture, I'd say per-server METADATA could be treated as a mailbox ones, except the mailbox ID would be constructed with forbidden IMAP characters. But I may have missed something. -- kael ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
