On Mon, Jul 30, 2012, at 09:36 AM, Greg Banks wrote: > G'day, > > On 30/07/2012, at 7:20, kael <ka-el@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 07/26/2012 07:28 AM, Bron Gondwana wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3723 > > > > > > Implementing unsolicited METADATA responses at the same time would be > > awesome, though. > [...] > > But if there's a good use case for it, we could implement such a thing. I should mention also that Bron has been talking for some time now about storing modseqs on per-message annotations as a way to make replication more efficient. I think this is an excellent idea and is easy enough to do, because we have a good modseq counter with sensible semantics for the mailbox and could store it in the db in a semi backwards compatible manner, and the CONDSTORE rfc allows for servers to keep separate modseqs on any kind of per-message data. Once we do that, it would be relatively easy to emit unsolicited ANNOTATION responses. It might be feasible to do similar things for per-mailbox annotations. But per-server annotations are...less obvious. -- Greg. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/ To Unsubscribe: https://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/mailman/listinfo/info-cyrus
