> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: >> Found it, sort of. The messages in question don't have any Received: >> headers. They are in the Sent folder and old clients/servers didn't seem >> to send Received: headers in that case. >> Now, does it make sense to fall back to Date: header in that case to >> determine internaldate? >> >> Something like this in message_create_record()? >> >> --- cyrus-imapd-2.4.6/imap/message.c.orig 2010-12-20 >> 14:15:49.000000000 +0100 >> +++ cyrus-imapd-2.4.6/imap/message.c 2011-01-19 10:51:57.000000000 >> +0100 >> @@ -570,6 +570,9 @@ >> if (body->received_date) >> newdate = message_parse_date(body->received_date, >> PARSE_DATE|PARSE_TIME|PARSE_ZONE|PARSE_NOCREATE|PARSE_GMT); >> + else if (body->date) >> + newdate = message_parse_date(body->date, >> + >> PARSE_DATE|PARSE_TIME|PARSE_ZONE|PARSE_NOCREATE|PARSE_GMT); >> if (newdate) >> record->internaldate = newdate; >> } >> >> >> This should apply only to locally copied messages (via IMAP) and >> therefore >> should be quite safe, is it? > > Hmm... absolutely. That should be good. I thought we did that already... > > As I'm telling everyone right now - can you create a bugzilla and tag it > for 2.4.x. I'm busy moving at the moment - but I'll come back to this > soon! Thanks Bron, I found out why it fails but I don't know what the correct fix would be. See here http://bugzilla.cyrusimap.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3388 Regards, Simon ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
