On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Simon Matter wrote: > Found it, sort of. The messages in question don't have any Received: > headers. They are in the Sent folder and old clients/servers didn't seem > to send Received: headers in that case. > Now, does it make sense to fall back to Date: header in that case to > determine internaldate? > > Something like this in message_create_record()? > > --- cyrus-imapd-2.4.6/imap/message.c.orig 2010-12-20 > 14:15:49.000000000 +0100 > +++ cyrus-imapd-2.4.6/imap/message.c 2011-01-19 10:51:57.000000000 +0100 > @@ -570,6 +570,9 @@ > if (body->received_date) > newdate = message_parse_date(body->received_date, > PARSE_DATE|PARSE_TIME|PARSE_ZONE|PARSE_NOCREATE|PARSE_GMT); > + else if (body->date) > + newdate = message_parse_date(body->date, > + PARSE_DATE|PARSE_TIME|PARSE_ZONE|PARSE_NOCREATE|PARSE_GMT); > if (newdate) > record->internaldate = newdate; > } > > > This should apply only to locally copied messages (via IMAP) and therefore > should be quite safe, is it? Hmm... absolutely. That should be good. I thought we did that already... As I'm telling everyone right now - can you create a bugzilla and tag it for 2.4.x. I'm busy moving at the moment - but I'll come back to this soon! Bron. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
