On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 04:17:51PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > Bron Gondwana wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 09:03:11AM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote: > >>What is your new format proposal? > > > >I'll see :) Not sure yet - but mainly not sizeof(unsigned long)! > > If we make a wholesale change to the database, perhaps this might be > something we put in the 2.4 branch. It already has some > partial/complete extensions like QRESYNC, LIST-EXTENDED, > URLAUTH=BINARY and COMPRESS (which I backported to 2.3). > > I was also thinking that although the charset changes have been > fully tested at Fastmail that it too might be a candidate for 2.4. Yeah, fair enough! I did commit them to CVS, but it's easy enough to back them out and commit to a branch instead. Do we have a roadmap for what else people want on the 2.4 branch? I'd be happy to put a bit more effort into polishing up those features that are there so we can ship a 2.4 soonish. Say by April next year, which gives us 6 months to prepare. Bron. ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
