What is your new format proposal? Bron Gondwana wrote: > I'm in the process of implementing rfc 5464, which is what the > ANNOTATEMORE drafts turned into. > > Unfortunately, Cyrus' support is an early draft, before the paths > to everything were changed and the commands were renamed. It would > be great to be complient, and there is software out there like Kolab > which would benefit from it. > > Also, the database format is pretty nasty - complete with nulls > embedded in keys and other fun stuff (like platform dependent type > lengths codified in the format, ick) > > So I'm thinking: create a new metadata.db, require a conversion on upgrade > from annotations.db. I had a look, and none of our servers had ANY > annotations until I added a /comment to my INBOX for testing. > > Does anybody out there use annotations much? Does anybody know any code > that would be broken by changing the way annotations are done? > > Thanks, > > Bron. > -- Kenneth Murchison Systems Programmer Carnegie Mellon University ---- Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/ Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
