Re: Cyrus vs Dovecot

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12 Aug 2008, at 06:53, Mathieu Kretchner wrote:
> At present, we have a lot of I/O, we wonder if the last version of  
> cyrus  is improved for this point ?

Recent versions have several features designed to allow very large  
scaling of I/O.  In addition to optimization to the old architecture,  
header, index, cache, expunge, and squat can be moved to a separate  
metapartition.  That means you have (effectively) three possible I/O  
paths -- the mail, the indices, and the mailboxes.db.  Each can be on  
separate storage with optimal price vs performance characteristics  
for the proposed load.

With only 5000 users on two machines, I suspect simply replacing the  
old machines with new machines will be such a performance increase  
that very little optimization would be required.

:wes
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux