Re: Cyrus & ZFS performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 04:05:53PM -0700, Vincent Fox wrote:
> I just thought to report back to the list, that ZFS is working out well.
> 
> I asked a while ago about other's opinions, and got all thumbs up.
> 
> We deployed a setup with Sun T2000 running Solaris 10u3 (11/06)
> and a pair of Sun 3510FC arrays mirroring in a hybrid HA RAID
> 5+1+0 setup that I can describe further if anyone cares.
> 
> We currently have 27,323 accounts on it, and it is performing
> very well, with atime=off and compression=on.  We have only
> recently migrated a lot of this existing userbase over using
> an imapsync method,  so we are not as yet seeing so much of
> space/performance benefits of single instance store.

After our migration of staff to Cyrus we hardlinked exact duplicates
together. I used faster-dupemerge from
http://www.furryterror.org/~zblaxell/dupemerge/dupemerge.html with some
modifications (mainly that it would only link files matching /^\d+\.$/)

This resulted in only small space savings but still seemed worth doing;
the main "cost" was some extra IO.

-- 
Tim Bannister
IT Services

e: Tim.Bannister@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
w: http://www.manchester.ac.uk/itservices
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux