Cyrus & ZFS performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I just thought to report back to the list, that ZFS is working out well.

I asked a while ago about other's opinions, and got all thumbs up.

We deployed a setup with Sun T2000 running Solaris 10u3 (11/06)
and a pair of Sun 3510FC arrays mirroring in a hybrid HA RAID
5+1+0 setup that I can describe further if anyone cares.

We currently have 27,323 accounts on it, and it is performing
very well, with atime=off and compression=on.  We have only
recently migrated a lot of this existing userbase over using
an imapsync method,  so we are not as yet seeing so much of
space/performance benefits of single instance store.

The snapshot feature lets us keep 14 days worth in the pool and
beyond that we'd go to backups.  Actually doing NetBackup of
a Cyrus partition is incredibly slow however, so we are looking
at replication to another server for disaster recovery. Then
perhaps we can dispense with tapes entirely.



----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux