Re: Sharing Murder?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29 Nov 2006, at 10:46, Janne Peltonen wrote:
The part '... all "replicated" servers can serve the same mailboxes from a shared filesystem' attracted my attention. Is this the LB that is reported not
to work with current murder/replication? Or is this something else?

In the "replicated" mupdate_config, each backend (nothing to do with replication) is meant to serve data from a common mail spool, while maintaining a "replicated" copy of mailboxes.db. The changes to implement this IMAP_ENUM_MUPDATE_CONFIG_REPLICATED are isolated to imap/mupdate-client.c, effectively to just remove references to the backend server. So, this configuration would remove the various locking problems surrounding mailboxes.db, since each backend would be maintaining a separate copy. Any concerns related to locking in the mail spool would still be relevant, tho that locking is typically less esoteric. You'd need to have an mupdate master as well.

:wes
----
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

[Index of Archives]     [Cyrus SASL]     [Squirrel Mail]     [Asterisk PBX]     [Video For Linux]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]     [gtk]     [KDE]     [Gimp on Windows]     [Steve's Art]

  Powered by Linux